NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 3000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 11.8 billion / sec
• 2.5x more pipelines: 240 vs 96
• Around 52% better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 284.16 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 998 vs 570
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 116
• Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3773 vs 2363
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 vs 4.651
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 vs 213.211
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.865 vs 0.624
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 vs 10.521
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 vs 23.978

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 740 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1056 vs 218
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 vs 374
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1352 vs 543
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1056 vs 218
• 4.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 vs 374
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1352 vs 543

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	998 570
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	315 116
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3773 2363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.95 4.651
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	325.007 213.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.865 0.624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.794 10.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.961 23.978
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	218 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	374 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543 1352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	218 1056
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	374 1790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543 1352

Compare specifications (specs)