NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro CX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 8.9x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 192 vs 8
- 26.8x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 108
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 vs 108 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 481 vs 454
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 vs 454 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro CX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro CX | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 454 | 481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro CX | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G98 |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 | 6 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 323 | 326 |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |