NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 5.6x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 36 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 131 vs 90
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 36 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 131 vs 90 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 40 vs 32
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 109
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 40 vs 32 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 109 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 131 | 90 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 | 212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 328 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G84 | M72 |
Launch date | 1 June 2007 | 14 May 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149.90 | |
Place in performance rating | 1305 | 1306 |
Price now | $149.90 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 289 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PowerPlay 7.0 |