NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 69% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 62 vs 46
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 March 2009 vs 14 August 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 vs 46 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 43.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 128 vs 64
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 422.4 gflops vs 176 gflops
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 586 vs 398
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3272 vs 2917
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3272 vs 2917
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops vs 176 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 768 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 586 vs 398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3272 vs 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3272 vs 2917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 398 | 586 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 62 | 46 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2917 | 3272 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2917 | 3272 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G94 | G92 |
Launch date | 30 March 2009 | 14 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $489 | |
Place in performance rating | 1407 | 1408 |
Price now | $186.29 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 176 gflops | 422.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 64 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 43.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 505 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |