NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and ATI Radeon 3100 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 344 MHz
- 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 418 vs 74
- 8.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 370
- 8.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 370
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 4 March 2008 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 344 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 vs 74 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 vs 370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 vs 370 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 228 vs 44
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 vs 44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 3100 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | ATI Radeon 3100 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 | 74 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | 228 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | 370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 | 370 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | ATI Radeon 3100 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | RS780 |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 4 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1262 | 1265 |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 344 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 288 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |