NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 576 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 90 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 155 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 900 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 36.8 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 128 vs 96
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 345.6 gflops vs 288 gflops
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 579 vs 417
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 92 vs 42
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3259
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3259

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	417 579
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	42 92
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3259 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3259 3349

Compare specifications (specs)