NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 16 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 467 vs 292
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 344
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 February 2008 vs 6 November 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 vs 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 344 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 240 vs 96
- Around 80% better floating-point performance: 288.48 gflops vs 160 gflops
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2648 vs 1820
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2648 vs 1820
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 240 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 288.48 gflops vs 160 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2648 vs 1820 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2648 vs 1820 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 | 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1820 | 2648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1820 | 2648 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | R600 |
Launch date | 23 February 2008 | 6 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 778 | 779 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 16 GTexel / s | 7.21 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.1 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |