NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 128 vs 32
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 352.0 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 131
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 1 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 vs 131 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 109 vs 88
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 109 vs 88 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | 131 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 | 109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3315 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G84 |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 1 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $925 | $149.90 |
Place in performance rating | 1305 | 1307 |
Price now | $925 | $149.90 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.12 | 1.87 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 352.0 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-HE | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |