NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 8.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 38
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 38 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 12.72 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 48 vs 8
- 5.7x better floating-point performance: 127.2 gflops vs 22.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1598 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 367 vs 93
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 12.72 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 127.2 gflops vs 22.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1598 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 367 vs 93 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 93 | 367 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 | 38 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2376 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2376 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G98 | G94 |
Launch date | 15 August 2008 | 14 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 1521 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.95 | |
Price now | $99.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.66 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | 127.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 2.2 GTexel / s | 12.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 505 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 51.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1598 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |