NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • 2x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 192 vs 64
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 192 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 823 vs 357
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3258 vs 3076
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3258 vs 3076
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 March 2009 vs 21 August 2008
Texture fill rate 38.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 64
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops vs 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 823 vs 357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3258 vs 3076
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3258 vs 3076

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS

  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 72 vs 47
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 72 vs 47

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
823
357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
47
72
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3258
3076
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3258
3076
Name NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
PassMark - G3D Mark 823 357
PassMark - G2D Mark 47 72
Geekbench - OpenCL 13337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3258 3076
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3258 3076

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla
Code name GT200B G94
Launch date 30 March 2009 21 August 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $799
Place in performance rating 1374 1376
Price now $109.99
Type Workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 9.89

Technical info

Core clock speed 600 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops 192 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 192 64
Texture fill rate 38.4 GTexel / s 19.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 108 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,400 million 505 million
CUDA cores 64
Gigaflops 240

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 198 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 51.2 GB / s 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
PureVideo HD