NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 825 vs 454
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 March 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 280 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 825 vs 454 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 89 vs 49
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 108 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 vs 49 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 825 | 454 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | 89 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT200B | G92 |
| Launch date | 30 March 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $328.50 |
| Place in performance rating | 1363 | 1364 |
| Price now | $109.99 | $328.50 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.89 | 2.78 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 280 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.4 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | |
| Gigaflops | 420 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
| SLI | ||

