NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 602 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 280 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 981 vs 378
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3285
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 vs 8 January 2008 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops vs 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 981 vs 378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 78 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 91 vs 66
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 78 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 91 vs 66 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 981 | 378 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 | 91 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G92 |
Launch date | 11 November 2008 | 8 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 1301 | 1304 |
Price now | $149.99 | $99.02 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.67 | 8.26 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 78 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |