AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 595.2 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1010 vs 979
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 vs 979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 68 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 38.5 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15302 vs 5747
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 38.5 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15302 vs 5747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1010 | 979 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 68 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5747 | 15302 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8750M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Mars | GT200B |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Launch date | 26 February 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1300 | 1303 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,799 | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.67 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 18.6 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |