NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 72 gflops vs 58.88 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 42 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 41 vs 33
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1687 vs 1252
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1687 vs 1252
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 vs 12 September 2007 |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops vs 58.88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 42 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 vs 33 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 vs 1252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 vs 1252 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 460 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 7.36 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 208 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 460 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7.36 GTexel / s vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 208 vs 174 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 174 | 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 33 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 | 1252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 | 1252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G84 |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 | 12 September 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 1585 | 1639 |
Price now | $59.46 | $89.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | 2.77 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 460 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | 58.88 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | 7.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 42 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |