NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
- 2x more texture fill rate: 7.2 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- 2x better floating-point performance: 72 gflops vs 35.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 174 vs 173
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1687 vs 1230
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1687 vs 1230
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops vs 35.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 174 vs 173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 vs 1230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 vs 1230 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 34 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 66 vs 41
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 34 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 vs 41 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 174 | 173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 66 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1687 | 1230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1687 | 1230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96C | G96 |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 | 30 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1585 | 1572 |
Price now | $59.46 | $72.50 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.88 | 2.68 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 72 gflops | 35.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 7.2 GTexel / s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 34 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |