NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 221 vs 99
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 800
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 vs 17 April 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 vs 99 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 vs 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 vs 800 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 580 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 72 vs 37
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 580 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 72 vs 37 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 | 99 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 37 | 72 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 | 800 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96 | MCP7A |
Launch date | 14 August 2008 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $527 | |
Place in performance rating | 1602 | 1605 |
Price now | $527 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 580 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | PCI |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR2 / GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |