NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1814 vs 1450
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1814 vs 1450

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 561 MHz vs 550 MHz
• Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 13.46 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 72 vs 48
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 162 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 494 vs 231
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 66 vs 53
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7043 vs 6543

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	231 494
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 66
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6543 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 1450
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 1450

Compare specifications (specs)