NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 53 vs 41

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 550 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 8.8 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 288 gflops vs 116.16 gflops
• Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 415 vs 231
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 1814
• Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 1814

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	231 415
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	53 41
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 3259
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 3259

Compare specifications (specs)