NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 660 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 626
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 187
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3025 vs 2070
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 5.068
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.635
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 11.384
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1069
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1069
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 660 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3025 vs 2070 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 vs 5.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 vs 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 vs 11.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 vs 1069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 vs 1069 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 174.555
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.696 vs 16.3
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 861
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1443
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 861
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1443
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 vs 174.555 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.696 vs 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1652 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2282 vs 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1652 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2282 vs 1443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA NVS 5400M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3025 | 2070 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 5.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 229.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 11.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 19.696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 1069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 2282 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 1069 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 1652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 2282 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Place in performance rating | 1442 | 1445 |
Price now | $79 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 660 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s | 10.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |