NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 660 MHz
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 626
  • Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 187
  • Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3025 vs 2070
  • Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 5.068
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.635
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 11.384
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1069
  • Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1069
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 660 MHz
Texture fill rate 22.59 GTexel / s vs 10.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 542.2 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1090 vs 626
PassMark - G2D Mark 254 vs 187
Geekbench - OpenCL 3025 vs 2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.649 vs 5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.642 vs 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.732 vs 11.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1892 vs 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1892 vs 1069

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5400M

  • Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 vs 174.555
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.696 vs 16.3
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1652 vs 861
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2282 vs 1443
  • Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1652 vs 861
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2282 vs 1443
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 229.562 vs 174.555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.696 vs 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1652 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2282 vs 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1652 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2282 vs 1443

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1090
626
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
254
187
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3025
2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.649
5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
174.555
229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.642
0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.732
11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.3
19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1892
1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
861
1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1443
2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1892
1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
861
1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1443
2282
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1100M NVIDIA NVS 5400M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1090 626
PassMark - G2D Mark 254 187
Geekbench - OpenCL 3025 2070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.649 5.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 174.555 229.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.642 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.732 11.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.3 19.696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1892 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 861 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1443 2282
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1892 1069
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 861 1652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1443 2282
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M NVIDIA NVS 5400M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 GF108
Launch date 23 July 2013 1 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $109.94
Place in performance rating 1442 1445
Price now $79
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 17.59

Technical info

Core clock speed 706 MHz 660 MHz
Floating-point performance 542.2 gflops 253.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 22.59 GTexel / s 10.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) MXM
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 44.8 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11