NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
Around 30% better floating-point performance: 1,151 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2949 vs 1473
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 564
Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8824 vs 4508
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 2475
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1721 vs 958
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 2304
Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 2475
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1721 vs 958
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 2304

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 January 2015 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 48
Floating-point performance	1,151 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2949 vs 1473
PassMark - G2D Mark	579 vs 564
Geekbench - OpenCL	8824 vs 4508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4080 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1721 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3288 vs 2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4080 vs 2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1721 vs 958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3288 vs 2304

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 55.2 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt

Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	55.2 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2949

1473

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

579

564

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8824

4508

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4080

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1721

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

2304

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4080

2475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1721

958

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

2304

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
PassMark - G3D Mark	2949	1473
PassMark - G2D Mark	579	564
Geekbench - OpenCL	8824	4508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4080	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1721	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3288	2304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4080	2475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1721	958
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3288	2304

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1200	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 8.0
Code name	GM107	Broadwell GT3e
Launch date	28 January 2015	5 September 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$321.97
Place in performance rating	798	799
Price now	$289.99
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	13.00
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,151 gflops	883.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	48
Texture fill rate	35.97 GTexel / s	55.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
Length	160 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory type	128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management
Quick Sync