NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 732 MHz
Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 210 Watt
3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
Around 32% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3800 MHz

Launch date	28 January 2015 vs 29 November 2011
Core clock speed	1058 MHz vs 732 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 448
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 210 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1280 MB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 3800 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
Around 14% better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 vs 31.949
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 466.139
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 2.629
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 25.411
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.575 vs 117.722
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 4080
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1721
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3288
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 4080
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1721
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3288

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	41.0 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,311.7 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	34.324 vs 31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1181.463 vs 466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.978 vs 2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	58.37 vs 25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.575 vs 117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4590 vs 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2133 vs 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4590 vs 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2133 vs 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 3288

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.949

34.324

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

466.139

1181.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.629

3.978

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25.411

58.37

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

117.722

121.575

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4080

4590

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1721

2133

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4080

4590

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1721

2133

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

3333

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
PassMark - G3D Mark	2949
PassMark - G2D Mark	579
Geekbench - OpenCL	8824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	31.949	34.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	466.139	1181.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.629	3.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	25.411	58.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	117.722	121.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4080	4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1721	2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3288	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4080	4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1721	2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3288	3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4197

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM107	GF110
Launch date	28 January 2015	29 November 2011
Launch price (MSRP)	$321.97	$289
Place in performance rating	798	801
Price now	$289.99
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	13.00
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	732 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,151 gflops	1,311.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	512	448
Texture fill rate	35.97 GTexel / s	41.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	210 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	160 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1280 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3800 MHz
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		152.0 GB / s
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management