NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1200 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 784 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 108 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 498
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.722 vs 70.194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 vs 22 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 784 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 vs 498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 vs 70.194 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4340 vs 2952
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 vs 8820
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.016 vs 31.949
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 vs 466.139
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.73 vs 2.629
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 vs 25.411
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 4080
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3382 vs 1721
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 3288
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 4080
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3382 vs 1721
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 3288
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops vs 1,151 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4340 vs 2952 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 vs 8820 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 vs 31.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 vs 466.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 vs 2.629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 vs 25.411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 vs 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 vs 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 vs 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 vs 3288 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2952 | 4340 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 578 | 498 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8820 | 12321 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.949 | 33.016 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 | 736.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.629 | 2.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.411 | 31.588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.722 | 70.194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1721 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 | 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 | 6373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1721 | 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 | 3311 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 28 January 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | $854.99 |
Place in performance rating | 798 | 681 |
Price now | $289.99 | $446.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | 11.92 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 784 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz | 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,151 gflops | 2,107 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 35.97 GTexel / s | 87.81 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 160 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |