NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 24x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1586 vs 66
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1586 vs 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 174 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 51 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 51 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1586 | 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK107 | RS880 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 1 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 979 | 982 |
Price now | $464 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.14 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 9 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |