NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla K10

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Tesla K10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Tesla K10

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 28% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 745 MHz
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 225 Watt

Launch date	1 March 2013 vs 1 May 2012
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10

9.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
6.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 3973
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 14.283
2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 386.006
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.018
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 vs 3493
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 vs 3493

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 1536 vs 384
Floating-point performance	2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14029 vs 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.736 vs 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	975.508 vs 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.39 vs 1.018
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3632 vs 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3632 vs 3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3339

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K10

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3973

14029

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.283

40.736

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

386.006

975.508

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.018

3.39

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3493

3632

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3493

3632

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3353

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D	NVIDIA Tesla K10
PassMark - G3D Mark	1586
PassMark - G2D Mark	406
Geekbench - OpenCL	3973	14029
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.283	40.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	386.006	975.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.018	3.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3493	3632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3493	3632
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339	3353

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D	NVIDIA Tesla K10
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK104
Launch date	1 March 2013	1 May 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$5,099
Place in performance rating	978	979
Price now	$464
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	4.14
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz	745 MHz
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	2x 2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	2x 1536
Texture fill rate	30.53 GTexel / s	2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	202 mm	272 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2x 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	2x 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5