NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Tesla K10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 1 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- 9.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
- 6.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 3973
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 14.283
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 386.006
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.018
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 vs 3493
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 vs 3493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 vs 3973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 vs 14.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 vs 386.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 vs 1.018 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 vs 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 vs 3493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K10
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Tesla K10 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1586 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3973 | 14029 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | 40.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | 975.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | 3.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 | 3632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 | 3632 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 1 May 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $5,099 |
| Place in performance rating | 977 | 978 |
| Price now | $464 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.14 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2x 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | 272 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000D with others
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
AMDFirePro V4900
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIATesla K10
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAGRID K2
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
