NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Tesla K10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 1 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- 9.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 384
- 6.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 3973
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 14.283
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 386.006
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.018
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 vs 3493
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 vs 3493
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.53 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 732.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 vs 3973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 vs 14.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 vs 386.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 vs 1.018 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 vs 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 vs 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K10
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Tesla K10 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1586 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3973 | 14029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | 40.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | 975.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | 3.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 | 3632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 | 3632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 1 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $5,099 |
Place in performance rating | 977 | 978 |
Price now | $464 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.14 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 732.7 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 GTexel / s | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | 272 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |