NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Tesla K20c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 35% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 706 MHz
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 225 Watt

Launch date	1 March 2013 vs 12 November 2012
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt vs 225 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20c

4.8x more texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
6.5x more pipelines: 2496 vs 384
4.8x better floating-point performance: 3,524 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 4000 MHz
3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15597 vs 3973
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.423 vs 14.283
3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1427.15 vs 386.006
4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.128 vs 1.018
4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.383 vs 15.605
5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.044 vs 31.155

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	146.8 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2496 vs 384
Floating-point performance	3,524 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15597 vs 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.423 vs 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1427.15 vs 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.128 vs 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	64.383 vs 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	179.044 vs 31.155

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20c

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3973

15597

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.283

39.423

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

386.006

1427.15

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.018

4.128

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.605

64.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.155

179.044

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D	NVIDIA Tesla K20c
PassMark - G3D Mark	1586
PassMark - G2D Mark	406
Geekbench - OpenCL	3973	15597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.283	39.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	386.006	1427.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.018	4.128
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	15.605	64.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.155	179.044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D	NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK110
Launch date	1 March 2013	12 November 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	$3,199
Place in performance rating	979	980
Price now	$464
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	4.14
Technical info
Core clock speed	954 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	3,524 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	2496
Texture fill rate	30.53 GTexel / s	146.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	202 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	208.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5