NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs ATI Radeon HD 4890

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and ATI Radeon HD 4890 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 190 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 vs 68

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4890

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 23.84 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 800 vs 384
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 572.2 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 3900 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1533 vs 1011

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4890

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1011 1533
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	256 68
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3348

Compare specifications (specs)