NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD Radeon HD 6770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 3008 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1357 vs 1255
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4570 vs 3802
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 vs 9.69
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 vs 1.004
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 vs 2279
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 vs 2279
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 21 January 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 vs 1255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4570 vs 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 vs 9.69 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 vs 1.004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 vs 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 vs 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s
- Around 39% higher pipelines: 800 vs 576
- Around 77% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 768.4 gflops
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 317 vs 284
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 vs 358.892
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 vs 21.761
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 vs 40.703
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 vs 2294
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 vs 2294
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 34.0 GTexel / s vs 32.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 vs 576 |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 768.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 317 vs 284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 vs 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 vs 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 vs 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 vs 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 vs 2294 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 | 1255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 317 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4570 | 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | 9.69 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | 615.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | 1.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | 26.748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | 115.157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 2546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 | 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 2546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 | 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Juniper |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 21 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $84.95 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 1115 | 1117 |
Price now | $159.99 | $76.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.91 | 27.17 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 768.4 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 32.02 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |