NVIDIA Quadro K2100M versus AMD Radeon HD 6770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD Radeon HD 6770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 96% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 108 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3008 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1357 versus 1255
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4570 versus 3802
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 versus 9.69
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 versus 1.004
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 2279
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 2279
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 21 January 2011 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 108 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3008 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 versus 1255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4570 versus 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 versus 9.69 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 versus 1.004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 versus 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 versus 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
- Environ 39% de pipelines plus haut: 800 versus 576
- Environ 77% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 317 versus 284
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 615.217 versus 358.892
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.748 versus 21.761
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 115.157 versus 40.703
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2546 versus 2294
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2546 versus 2294
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 800 versus 576 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 768.4 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 317 versus 284 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 615.217 versus 358.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.748 versus 21.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 115.157 versus 40.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2546 versus 2294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2546 versus 2294 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 6770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 | 1255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 284 | 317 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4570 | 3802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | 9.69 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | 615.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | 1.004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | 26.748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | 115.157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 2546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 | 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 2546 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 | 2279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 6770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK106 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 21 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $84.95 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1115 | 1117 |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | $76.99 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.91 | 27.17 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 667 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 768.4 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 800 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.02 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 108 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 198 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |