NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs AMD FirePro W5100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and AMD FirePro W5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 2978
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 531
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 11724
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 35.15
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 163.258
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 4397
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 4397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 31 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 1,428 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 vs 2978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 vs 531 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 vs 11724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 vs 35.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 vs 3.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 vs 163.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 vs 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 vs 4397 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 68 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 588.094
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 30.455
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1577
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1671
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1577
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1671
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 68 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 vs 588.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 vs 30.455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 1577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1671 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3572 | 2978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 531 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 11724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 35.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 838.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 3.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 57.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | 163.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 31 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
| Place in performance rating | 787 | 627 |
| Price now | $343.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | 171 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
