NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 778 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 43.6 GTexel / s
• Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3572 vs 1866
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 422
• Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 7872
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 22.161
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 vs 2.125
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 vs 75.212
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3537
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3537

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 588.094
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 30.455
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3398 vs 1577
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3117 vs 1671
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3398 vs 1577
• Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3117 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3572 1866
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	548 422
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12020 7872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.695 22.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	588.094 781.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.205 2.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.455 47.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.26 75.212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 3117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4921 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1577 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1671 3117

Compare specifications (specs)