NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1400 MHz
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3551 vs 1951
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 328
  • Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 6047
  • Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 20.831
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3396
  • Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3396
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 July 2014 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed 1046 MHz vs 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 68 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3551 vs 1951
PassMark - G2D Mark 542 vs 328
Geekbench - OpenCL 12020 vs 6047
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.695 vs 20.831
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921 vs 3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921 vs 3396

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

  • Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 960 vs 640
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1577
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1671
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1577
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1671
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 48.0 billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 640
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3551
1951
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
542
328
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
12020
6047
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.695
20.831
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4921
3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1577
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4921
3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1577
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1671
3350
Name NVIDIA Quadro K2200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark 3551 1951
PassMark - G2D Mark 542 328
Geekbench - OpenCL 12020 6047
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.695 20.831
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 165.39
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4921 3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1577 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1671 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4921 3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1577 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1671 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1193 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 22 July 2014 1 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $395.75
Place in performance rating 815 818
Price now $343.99
Type Workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 13.01

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1046 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops 1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 960
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s 48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 68 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 960

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 202 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 67.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA