NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 74% higher core clock speed: 1046 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
3.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3550 vs 1951
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 544 vs 328
Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 6032
Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 vs 20.831
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3396
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3396

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed	1046 MHz vs 600 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt vs 75 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3550 vs 1951
PassMark - G2D Mark	544 vs 328
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 6032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695 vs 20.831
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 3396

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 960 vs 640
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1671
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.0 billion / sec vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 640
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 1671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3550

1951

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

544

328

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12020

6032

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.695

20.831

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

3396

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4921

3396

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1577

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1671

3350

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark	3550	1951
PassMark - G2D Mark	544	328
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020	6032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.695	20.831
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	165.39
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921	3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1577	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1671	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921	3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1577	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1671	3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K2200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	22 July 2014	1 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75
Place in performance rating	815	818
Price now	$343.99
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	960
Texture fill rate	44.96 GTexel / s	48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		960
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	67.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA