NVIDIA Quadro K4000M vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000M and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 33.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 960 vs 800
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1585
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.46 vs 1.234
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3855 vs 3127
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3534
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3350
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3855 vs 3127
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3534
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3350

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790

• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 840 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,344.0 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 375 vs 301
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.318 vs 10.054
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 750.421 vs 544.601
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.768 vs 22.103
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.423 vs 36.553

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1978 1585
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.054 12.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	544.601 750.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.46 1.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.103 28.768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.553 121.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3855 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4957 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4470 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3855 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4957 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4470 3350

Compare specifications (specs)