NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 771 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 4.2x more pipelines: 1344 vs 320
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 432.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4332 vs 463
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 502 vs 375
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3311 vs 2907
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3311 vs 2907
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops vs 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4332 vs 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 vs 375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 vs 2907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 vs 2907 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 108 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4332 | 463 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 | 375 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12186 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | 2907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | 2907 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M96 |
Launch date | 22 July 2014 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 695 | 698 |
Price now | $446.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,107 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 87.81 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |