NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
2x more texture fill rate: 87.81 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
Around 52% better floating-point performance: 2,107 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
1080x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4340 vs 3901
Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 vs 11526
Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 vs 642.715
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 vs 26.532
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 vs 4843
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 vs 4843

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 July 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4340 vs 3901
Geekbench - OpenCL	12321 vs 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.588 vs 26.532
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373 vs 4843

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 771 MHz
Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 784 MHz
Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 108 Watt
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 498
Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 33.016
Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 2.73
Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 70.194
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3382
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 3311
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3382
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 3311

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 771 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz vs 784 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 108 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	42.463 vs 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.933 vs 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	133.458 vs 70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 3311

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4340

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

521

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12321

11526

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.016

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

736.063

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.73

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.588

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.194

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6373

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3382

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3311

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6373

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3382

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3311

3329

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K4200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	4340	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	521
Geekbench - OpenCL	12321	11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.016	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.73	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.588	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.194	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3382	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3311	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3382	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3311	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	117

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K4200	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Launch date	22 July 2014	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$854.99	$149
Place in performance rating	681	707
Price now	$446.99	$299.01
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	11.92	15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	784 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	771 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1344	640
Texture fill rate	87.81 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	108 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA