NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 77.7 billion / sec
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 365 Watt
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1707 MHz
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 4118
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3683
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3330
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 4118
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3683
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3330
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 24 March 2011
Texture fill rate 98.69 GTexel / s vs 77.7 billion / sec
Pipelines 1536 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 365 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 1707 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6747 vs 4118
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 vs 3330
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6747 vs 4118
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 vs 3330

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 771 MHz
  • Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 2,369 gflops
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 3211
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 349
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 vs 11427
  • 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 vs 5.972
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 355.305
  • 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 1.022
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 vs 15.706
  • 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 vs 34.772
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 771 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 2,369 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3341 vs 3211
PassMark - G2D Mark 394 vs 349
Geekbench - OpenCL 12811 vs 11427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.921 vs 5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1116.126 vs 355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.799 vs 1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.114 vs 15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 107.239 vs 34.772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3211
3341
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
349
394
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11427
12811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.972
30.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
355.305
1116.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.022
3.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.706
49.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
34.772
107.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6747
4118
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3362
3330
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6747
4118
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3362
3330
Name NVIDIA Quadro K5100M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark 3211 3341
PassMark - G2D Mark 349 394
Geekbench - OpenCL 11427 12811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.972 30.921
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 355.305 1116.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.022 3.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.706 49.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 34.772 107.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6747 4118
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 3330
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6747 4118
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 3330
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK104 GF110
Launch date 23 July 2013 24 March 2011
Place in performance rating 778 779
Price now $309.99 $184
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 13.80 30.41
Launch price (MSRP) $699

Technical info

Core clock speed 771 MHz 1215 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,369 gflops 2x 1,244.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1536 1024
Texture fill rate 98.69 GTexel / s 77.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 365 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 3,000 million
CUDA cores 1024
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort
Display Port 1.2
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)
SLI options Quad
Supplementary power connectors Two 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.2
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB / s 327.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz 1707 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI
Surround