NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 77.7 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 vs 3330
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 4118
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 24 March 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s vs 77.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 771 MHz
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 2,369 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 3211
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 349
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 vs 11427
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 vs 5.972
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 355.305
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 1.022
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 vs 15.706
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 vs 34.772
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 2,369 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 3211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 vs 11427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 vs 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 vs 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 vs 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 vs 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 vs 34.772 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3211 | 3341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | 12811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 3.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF110 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 24 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 778 | 779 |
Price now | $309.99 | $184 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | 30.41 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 365 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1707 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |