NVIDIA Quadro K5100M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 98.69 GTexel / s versus 77.7 billion / sec
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 365 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 1707 MHz
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 versus 4118
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 versus 3330
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 versus 4118
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 versus 3330
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 24 March 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s versus 77.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1024 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 365 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 1707 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 versus 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 versus 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3330 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Environ 58% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 2,369 gflops
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 versus 3211
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 versus 349
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 versus 11427
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 versus 5.972
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 versus 355.305
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 versus 1.022
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 versus 15.706
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 versus 34.772
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 771 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 2,369 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 versus 3211 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 versus 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 versus 11427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 versus 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 versus 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 versus 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 versus 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 versus 34.772 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3211 | 3341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11427 | 12811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 3.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 24 March 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 778 | 779 |
Prix maintenant | $309.99 | $184 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | 30.41 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 365 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
Options SLI | Quad | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | 1707 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |