NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD FirePro V7900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 725 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 151 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2847 vs 2305
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 14.134
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 676.409
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.309
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 36.678
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 2996
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 2996
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2847 vs 2305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 vs 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 vs 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 vs 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 vs 36.678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 vs 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 vs 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900
- Around 83% higher texture fill rate: 58.0 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- Around 82% better floating-point performance: 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
- 1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 307
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 8849
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 137.786
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 58.0 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,856.0 gflops vs 1,017 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 vs 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 vs 137.786 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD FirePro V7900 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2847 | 2305 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 336 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 27733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 14.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 676.409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 1.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 36.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 171.25 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD FirePro V7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GM107 | Cayman |
Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 24 May 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Place in performance rating | 851 | 854 |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1072 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 1,856.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 31.78 GTexel / s | 58.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,640 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB / 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |