NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 650 MHz
Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
Around 61% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 873.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 150 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3400 MHz
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 22.202
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 661.765
Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 1.872
Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 28.112
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 76.736

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 December 2015 vs 11 October 2010
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 336
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops vs 873.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 3400 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113 vs 661.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 1.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 28.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896 vs 76.736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

47.281

22.202

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

782.113

661.765

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.5

1.872

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.048

28.112

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

172.896

76.736

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3353

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446
PassMark - G2D Mark	336
Geekbench - OpenCL	8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281	22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113	661.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5	1.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048	28.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896	76.736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3353

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF104
Launch date	3 December 2015	11 October 2010
Place in performance rating	700	1061
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	873.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	640	336
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s	36.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
Length		210 mm
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	108.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus