NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 2772
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 325
  • Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 24.487
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 600.985
  • Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.281
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 35.452
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 61.984
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 1105
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1974
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3246
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 1105
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1974
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3246
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 December 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3446 vs 2772
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 vs 325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.281 vs 24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 782.113 vs 600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.5 vs 2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.048 vs 35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 172.896 vs 61.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4920 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 vs 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4920 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 vs 3246

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

  • Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
  • Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
  • Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
  • Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8831 vs 8148
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 67.78 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1152 vs 640
Floating-point performance 1,627 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 8831 vs 8148

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3446
2772
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
336
325
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8148
8831
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
47.281
24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
782.113
600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.5
2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
51.048
35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
172.896
61.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4920
1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4920
1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3355
3246
Name NVIDIA Quadro M2000M NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3446 2772
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 325
Geekbench - OpenCL 8148 8831
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.281 24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 782.113 600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.5 2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.048 35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 172.896 61.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4920 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4920 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355 3246

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 3 December 2015 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 700 1074
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,499
Price now $379.99
Value for money (0-100) 9.50

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1098 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 706 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops 1,627 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 1152
Texture fill rate 43.92 GTexel / s 67.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5.0 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus