NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 2772
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 325
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 24.487
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 600.985
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.281
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 35.452
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 61.984
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 1105
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1974
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3246
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 1105
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1974
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3246
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 vs 2772 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 vs 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 vs 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 vs 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 vs 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 vs 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3246 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8831 vs 8148
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8831 vs 8148 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 | 2772 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | 8831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3246 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 700 | 1074 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 706 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | 67.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |