NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 706 MHz
Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 2772
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 325
Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 24.487
Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 600.985
Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.281
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 35.452
2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 172.896 vs 61.984
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 1105
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1974
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3246
4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 1105
Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1974
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3246

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 December 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446 vs 2772
PassMark - G2D Mark	336 vs 325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113 vs 600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896 vs 61.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3246

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 67.78 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
Around 16% better floating-point performance: 1,627 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8831 vs 8148

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	67.78 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1152 vs 640
Floating-point performance	1,627 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	8831 vs 8148

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3446

2772

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

336

325

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8148

8831

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

47.281

24.487

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

782.113

600.985

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.5

2.281

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.048

35.452

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

172.896

61.984

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

1105

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

1974

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3246

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

1105

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

1974

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3246

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446	2772
PassMark - G2D Mark	336	325
Geekbench - OpenCL	8148	8831
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281	24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113	600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5	2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048	35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	172.896	61.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920	1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3246
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920	1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3246

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	3 December 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	700	1074
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,499
Price now		$379.99
Value for money (0-100)		9.50
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	1,627 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	1152
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s	67.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	5.0	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus