NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 13.7x more texture fill rate: 65.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 1024 vs 80
- 21.9x better floating-point performance: 2,099 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 84x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4284 vs 51
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 vs 51 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 380 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 | 482 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 | 51 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GM206 | RV620 |
| Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 1 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 473 | 344 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 65.6 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VHDCI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |

