NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 16% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 837 MHz
Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1051 MHz vs 876 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
835.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 95.613 vs 62.027
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1341.18 vs 1218.137
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.869 vs 5.835
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.683 vs 36.842
Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 366.321 vs 215.546

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 19 February 2013
Core clock speed	975 MHz vs 837 MHz
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz vs 876 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613 vs 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18 vs 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869 vs 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683 vs 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321 vs 215.546

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

2x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 93.6 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 1,536
Around 57% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2,995 gflops
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 6939
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 478
Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23870 vs 22163
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 9399
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3685
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3339
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 9399
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3685
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3339

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	187.5 billion / sec vs 93.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2688 vs 1,536
Floating-point performance	4,709 gflops vs 2,995 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8190 vs 6939
PassMark - G2D Mark	630 vs 478
Geekbench - OpenCL	23870 vs 22163
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10176 vs 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10176 vs 9399
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3339

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6939

8190

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

478

630

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

22163

23870

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

95.613

62.027

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1341.18

1218.137

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.869

5.835

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

83.683

36.842

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

366.321

215.546

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9399

10176

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9399

10176

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3339

3356

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
PassMark - G3D Mark	6939	8190
PassMark - G2D Mark	478	630
Geekbench - OpenCL	22163	23870
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	95.613	62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1341.18	1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.869	5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	83.683	36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	366.321	215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9399	10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9399	10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	2901

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M5000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GM204	GK110
Launch date	18 August 2015	19 February 2013
Place in performance rating	450	428
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$2,054.59
Value for money (0-100)		5.09
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	876 MHz
Core clock speed	975 MHz	837 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,995 gflops	4,709 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1,536	2688
Texture fill rate	93.6 GTexel / s	187.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	7,080 million
CUDA cores		2688
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB / s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA