NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
14x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 500 MHz
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11804 vs 10116
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11804 vs 10116
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3356
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 April 2016 vs 10 July 2015
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11804 vs 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11804 vs 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 224.0 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Around 75% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2048
Around 69% better floating-point performance: 7,168 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 698
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9592 vs 7915
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3684
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3684

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	224.0 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines	3584 vs 2048
Floating-point performance	7,168 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	796 vs 698
PassMark - G3D Mark	9592 vs 7915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3684

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

698

796

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7915

9592

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11804

10116

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11804

10116

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3684

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3684

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4193

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4193

3356

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G2D Mark	698	796
PassMark - G3D Mark	7915	9592
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11804	10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11804	10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4193	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4193	3356
Geekbench - OpenCL		53724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		140.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3595.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		13.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		132.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		789.536
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4739

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Code name	GM204	Fiji
Launch date	8 April 2016	10 July 2015
Place in performance rating	239	277
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$549
Price now		$399.99
Value for money (0-100)		35.98
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	861 MHz
Floating-point performance	4,252 gflops	7,168 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2048	3584
Texture fill rate	132.9 GTexel / s	224.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	5,200 million	8,900 million
Compute units		56
Stream Processors		3584
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Supplementary power connectors		2x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Mantle
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	224.4 GB / s	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 bit
Memory clock speed	7012 MHz	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)