NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 2.3x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 4.7x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 995
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 254
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 4397
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 30.747
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 330.464
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 1.804
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 19.781
• 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 30.177
• 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 1045
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2393
• 6.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 1045
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2393
• 4.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1591 vs 384

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3346
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1591 384

Compare specifications (specs)