NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1093 MHz
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
• Around 35% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 3217
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 312
• Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 10582
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 52.821
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 793.297
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 3.631
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 48.966
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 163.204
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 4941
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2645
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 4941
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2645

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 47 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4500 3217
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	590 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6796 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 3359

Compare specifications (specs)