NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 512 vs 448
• Around 84% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.1x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4453 vs 3176
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 362
• Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 11024
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 26.055
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 2.99
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 41.654
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 832.248
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3702
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3348
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3702
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4453 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	601 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	15667 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.86 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	832.248 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.039 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.117 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	245.081 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3702 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3348 9064

Compare specifications (specs)