NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 651 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3404 MHz
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 2 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 651 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1680
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1680
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | GF110 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 2 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 706 | 709 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 651 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 3404 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |