NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 732.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 2446
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 2446
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 vs 1631
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 vs 1631
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 30.53 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 732.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 vs 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 vs 1631 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 51 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1974 vs 1680
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1974 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1974 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1974 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 1974 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1578 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.332 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 265.424 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.093 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 672 | 1206 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $164.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 732.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 30.53 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X550
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 260 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
