NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1046 MHz
• Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 4921
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 4921
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 vs 1577
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 vs 1577
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1680 vs 1671
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1680 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8429 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8429 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1825 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1825 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1680 1671

Compare specifications (specs)