NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 796 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1163 MHz
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 5523
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 5523
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 796 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1163 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 1,812 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 5523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 5523 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1825
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1825
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 1680
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 5523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 5523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 3325 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4000 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14591 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.056 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.868 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GM206 |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 8 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 672 | 572 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $437.75 | |
| Price now | $409.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1163 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 796 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 1,812 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 56.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 201 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X550
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 260 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
