NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA Quadro K4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 771 MHz
• Around 89% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 784 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 87.81 GTexel / s
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2,107 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 108 Watt
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5400 MHz
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6957 vs 4340
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 498
• Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22896 vs 12321
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 33.016
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 736.063
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.736 vs 2.73
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 31.588
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 70.194
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 6373
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3382
• Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 6373
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3382

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4200

• Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 4340
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 498
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 12321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 33.016
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 736.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 2.73
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 31.588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 70.194
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 6373
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3311

Compare specifications (specs)